 |
| Charles Cohen, analogtime02, 2003, Digital Type-C Photograph, 40"x52" |
 |
| Charles Cohen, Untitled,
2011, archival pigment print, 20"x27" ed. 10 plus 2 AP |
Charles Cohen was born in New York
and earned a MFA with honors from the Rhode Island School of Design. As an
artist, Cohen’s work focuses on the reality of human perception. His photographs in “That”
and “About Face” are produced for the viewers reaction the unfamiliar profiles of everyday objects rather than to glorify the objects themselves. In a similar way, through erasure of the subject of each print in “Buff” and “analog time”, Cohen
forces his audience to replace expected visual cues with their own memories,
and in the process provides them a glimpse of into their own psyche. In a more subtle
way, “Standard Double” comments on the nature of the perception of self,
through his orchestrated presentation of doppelgangers in TV sitcoms.
 |
| Charles Cohen, Still Shot from "Standard Double", Untitled,
2002,Type-C Color photograph, 20"x30" |
In thinking about Cohen’s work, the aspect which most
intrigues me is his concept of “erasure”.
Much of Cohen’s work plays with the notion of omission. Looking at Cohen’s
art, I am reminded of how selective perception really is. If we're disinterested in information, the mind shunts out all the garbage down neural-trenches so deep we seldom recognize they exist. This
process occurs so quickly and unconsciously people often surprise themselves when they cannot repeat a sentence they just finished. All the unwanted details of our lives are filtered from our
minds, sometimes consciously, sometimes unconsciously. Through omission Cohen’s work tests the perceptual filters of its audience, and so we find ourselves visualizing in his work only
the things we desire, expect, or fear most. This concept of filtering is all the more relevant in a world where the internet allows us to censor information through search engines that are just as much about removing the things we don't want to see as they are about showing us what we desire.
 |
| Charles Cohen, pic_071, 2001 archival ink print, 10"x15" |
Cohen's work finds its strength in the ability to manipulate and utilize audience perspective in the basest way possible. The heart of Cohen's art is its ability to make the viewer acutely aware of his/her own point-of-view in a unbiased and disassociated way. The artwork itself clearly reflects back the viewer's own cognitive bias, and so (as with all art) each person sees in Cohen's art only the things that are most important to them. What makes Cohen's use of this bias distinctive is that through his work the audience is made actively aware that they only recognize what is significant to them within the piece itself.
The mood behind Cohen's work is very personal and introspective, which perhaps lessens the opportunity for open discussion about the ideas he presents us with. I feel that presenting his concepts in a collaborative or participative way would only serve to further strengthen the impact of his work. Imagine, for example, an exhibition where before you enter you must select a color card and then fill out a short survey. Based on the results of this survey, the sections of the digital images in the exhibition that the survey results predict you will find distasteful or otherwise undesirable are blocked out forming a silhouette in the color you selected on your color card. If each participant in the exhibition has their color card visible, everyone in the room will know the things that (based on the survey) you find distasteful. In this way, you get the audience actively involved (and hopefully discussing) this notion of the filters that we place on our own ideas and how they affect our lives.
After reading this piece I was able to realize that his art really points out what you actually pay attention to when you look at any given image. I find it very similar to Jochem Hendricks suggestion behind his work. Jochem Hendricks tries to highlight what people look at with his Eye Helmet. Also, your point about how we as human beings throw away all the garbage that we do not care about is very true. When people are in the zone or focusing on something then they have a tough time describing the environment around them. Through this reading and my reading I think its crucial how much or mind plays in the role of art.
ReplyDeleteWhat I found most interesting about Cohen's work was what happens to the viewer (or at least to me) when looking at the cut out space. In my mind I try to visualize what the figure may have looked like before Cohen erased the figure. It's almost like my brain does not want to accept the empty space and tries to fill it in so I start wondering what the person may have looked like. It would be interesting to see what would happen to the work if Cohen displayed the image before the cut out alongside the finished image with the person whited out.
ReplyDeleteI think that displaying the image unedited just before the viewer gets to see the cutout would have an interesting impact on the audience. I can almost imagine two exhibitions parallel to one another. WIth the second being identical to the first except including the cutouts. I think it would make an interesting statement.
Delete